
Roberts/McKay v C.R. England
Latest Blog Entries
Friday, September 30, 2011 7:13:26 PM
The Case for More, Not Less, Franchisee Protection
Current franchise laws and regulations do not go far enough to protect the interests of franchisees against often times overreaching franchisors.
|
Friday, September 30, 2011 7:10:28 PM
Support the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (House Bill 1020)
Federal appellate courts continue to put their full weight behind arbitration and erode the flexibility of judges to set aside or at least limit one-sided arbitration schemes and results.
|
Friday, September 30, 2011 7:08:48 PM
Welcome to Franchisee Law Blog
Lagarias & Boulter, L.L.P. devotes itself to keeping up-to-date on issues important to the franchising community and to franchisees in particular.
|
Current Cases
Class Action Against C.R. England, Inc., Opportunity Leasing, Inc. And Horizon
Truck Sales And Leasing LLC.
On May 31, 2011, Lagarias & Boulter L.L.P. has filed a putative class action on
behalf of lease drivers against C.R. England, Opportunity Leasing, Inc. and
Horizon Truck Sales and Leasing. LLC. in the Federal District Court for the
Northern District of California.
The C.R. England class action has been brought by former lease drivers Charles
Roberts and Kenneth McKay and is brought on behalf of all others similarly
situated that have leased trucks. The Complaint alleges that the defendants
violated various franchise, business opportunity, and consumer protection laws
when signing up drivers for their truck driver lease programs. Specifically,
Plaintiffs bring eleven claims: 1. California Franchise Investment Law
Violation, Cal. Corp. Code § 31000 et seq; 2. California Seller Assisted
Marketing Plan Act Violation, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1812.200 et seq.; 3. California
Unfair Competition Law Violation, Cal. Bus. and Prof. Code § Section 17200 et
seq.; 4. Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act Violation, Utah Code § 13-11-1 et
seq., 5. Utah Business Opportunity Disclosure Act Violation, Utah Code Ann. §
13-15- 1, et seq; 6. Indiana Business Opportunity Transactions Law Violation, IC
24-5-8-1 et seq.; 7. Federal Telemarketing And Consumer Fraud And Abuse
Prevention Act Violation, 15 U.S.C. §6101 et seq.; 8. Common Law Fraud; 9.
Unjust Enrichment; 10. Declaratory Relief; 11. Utah Truth In Advertising Act
Violation, Utah Code § 13–11a–1 et seq.
If you have any information relevant to this lawsuit and/or were a lease driver
for defendants, please submit a consultation request or call Rob Boulter at
(415) 460-0100 ext 112 or e-mail
rsb@lb-attorneys.com.